resurrection?

hello all. not much to say, other than we need to take a live wire to the orange-n-blue-blood pumping vein of this blog. we bullshit so much about the knicks through bbm, gchat, email, phone, telegraph, carrier pigeon, Morse, et al., it would really be worth using this platform to archive it.

that being said--a quick few thoughts:

1) i feel like i should be researching these jason kidd and grant hill rumors on netscape navigator
2) the jordan hill-mikki moore comparisons need to stop
3) has anyone appreciated the irony that the knicks #1 draft target was a perfect portmanteau of the two knick acquisitions that very efficiently sank our entire franchise 'Steph(o)en' 'Curry'
4) i think i might get this image tattooed on my face, and if not, screen printed on to my tombstone:
http://www.euroleague.net/resourceserver/12311/a80d1475-f44a-4f94-ba9d-16c1583b9b76/da1/rglang/en-US/filename/a80.jpg (please cut and past the link to your browser, well worth it)
5) we're one Lou Amundsen away from boasting a lineup of Huey, Duey, and Louie
6) the jordan hill, danilo, and wilson threesome needs a nickname. all i got is willy, nilly, and hilly, but think we can do better.
7) what would you less rather wear-- an A-Rod jersey shirt that says 'A-Rod', not Rodriguez on the back, or the St. Patty's day green Nate Robinson jersey?
8) let's pick the chatter back up here fellas . . .

PEw going to Hall of Fame Friday night 7:30

http://www.nba.com/gallery/HOF_Ewing/20080828_1.html

http://www.nba.com/


Check it out the King of Kings County... imagine of PEw and BKing had played together. Two full seasons on the same team at the Worlds Most, ('86 and '87) and never played a game together. Two years later, King was back to dropping 25+ a night, with the BULLETS (vomit). Good article, courtesy of P slims
http://www.nba.com/inside_stuff/hoop_april2004_king.html

Thoughts heading into 08-09

1)Trade Zach Randolph for anything. Trade him for a towel kid. Just trade him. We can't have our starting 4 and 5 guy both be horrible defenders. Curry was an improved player in 07. Then he regressed big time last year. Curry can be the Shaq of D'Antoni's system....He is a true low post player, whereas randolph wants to hang around the perimiter. He will need to get in better shape. For some reason, I think D'Antoni will get the best out of his guys. Keep Eddy, trade Randolph............

2)Keep stephon to start the season. He also, had long stretches of good play two years ago in 07. As Mike Breen pointed out, he will be playing for the last contract of his career, so maybe he is motivated to try for the first time in his career not to be a looser. Either way, if he's good, we ride him out till the end of the season and dont re-sign him, otherwise, if its not working out, he can be shipped at trade deadline time. It hurts to have to hate marbury. But he's made it impossible. Let's see if he can do something positive in one last try.....

3)DLee might get traded i hear. But why? I think he should be the starting 4 in the D'antoni system.....

Ode to P Ew - Big Fella in hall of fame

://www.nba.com/encyclopedia/hof_2008.html

Last night at halftime of the championship game (one of the better ones ever, no?) I flipped through the channels and came to FoxSports to hear this asshole Gary Apple talking about how theres no way Ewing could be considered the greatest knick of all time, critisizing him for always promissing to win big games and not always coming through, and generally degrading his career on the day he was inducted into the hall, also pointing out that ewing "wasnt always the most warm, fan friendly superstar in new york, and he wasnt good with the media". Yeah, one of those sensitive sports writer assholes, who is clearly missing something, like the point.

In defense of the big fella, I'm going to address these points one by one:

*He can't be considered the greatest knick of all time:
Stupid. Of course he can be considered the greatest knick of all time. This is clearly a debateable topic, but most certainly to knicks fans its a friendly, happy debate, not one that needs to be had with idiots who are going to point out any negative about patrick and ultimately just harp on the fact that he, in a team game, didnt deliver a championship. Three knicks; Clyde , Willis, and Ewing, are up for the honor of greatest knick of all time. Thats not just my opinion, but the obvious fact, if you are a knicks fan. And, any one of these guys could be considered the greatest. A serious argument about this can only be one in which the parties respectfully disagree and accept that yeah, you really could say its either of the three. But to the point, here's why Ewing is certainly in the conversation: Um, Clyde had Willis and Willis had Clyde. And Willis and Clyde had other great players on their team, perenial all stars and hall of fame players in Bill Bradley and Dave Debeussher, and of course Earl the Pearl. That is considered one of the greatest starting 5's of all time. Ewing never played with anyone who is even approaching Hall of Fame caliber. He never played with a second perenial all star, a second go to guy, let alone 3 or 4 others. Early in his career, he had Mark Jackson, in the middle it was Starks and Oak - all great guys, GREAT guys that we loved, but not the level of guys that could be considered that second scorer, that second great player. The most talented scorers ewing ever played with were Houston and Spree, at the end of his career. Yet year in and year out, the knicks were serious contenders. Lost lots of tough series. Lost lots of game 7's. Lost to the bulls a lot. Michael Jordan had Scottie Pippin. Hello, put Scottie Pippin in his prime on the knicks. Give Ewing a guard as good as Clyde, like Willis had. You feel me. The Knicks were contenders year in, year out, and they had character, heart, toughness - all the charictaristics ewing had as their leader. And along the way, he is the NBA's 15th or 16th all time leading scorer, 20 something all time in rebounds, 5th or 6th all time in blocked shots, and leads the knicks all time in every possible category except 3's. So you gotta be an idiot or you werent watching if you think he cant be considered the greatest knick ever.

*He promised to win big games, and didnt always deliver:
I mean, he always predicted they were going to win. And a lot of the time they did. He'd say they'd win round one and they would, he'd say they'd win round 2 and they would, and then when they didnt win, it became headline news. Same shit as always with the new york media. Whatever is all i have to say to that. If you are mad at him for guaranteeing wins, whatever. Maybe if he wouldnt have said anything at all while the reporters were swarming after practice, then the knicks would have won? So stupid.

* He wasnt always good with the media
Look at some of the assholes in the league. P Ew was a standup guy. All he did was bust his ass 24/7 for 15 years in NY to try win a title. Have you ever seen a retirement ceremony like the one for P Ew in 2003. Random great players from all over the league, his peers that he played against, all making the trip to the Garden to honor him. Jordan, Barkley, Chris Mullin, Clyde Drexler, freekin Dr J....Not to mention so many of his former team mates and all the legends like clyde and willis. I mean, thats how much respect there was for him. Jordan didnt have a retirement ceremony like that in chicago... not even close. I'll paste it hear i found it on youtube for those that wanna watch. So who cares if he wasnt great with the writers because their questions were annoying and irritating. Most of the media is annoying. ........... Proud day to be a knicks fan to see P ew go into the hall with Olajuwon, Riley, Dicky V.....

You should really take the time to watch this. Four parts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQVxx6YZV5U

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6KCEwSjKAc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D70xd03j644

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_NaN896JzI

A Good Move by the Dolans? I cannot believe it!

I was just informed of this story by the real estate blog the Real Deal. Apparently, there have been serious plans to move Madison Square Garden, redevelop Penn Station, open up millions of sq. ft. of office space, and rename it Moynihan Station, after the late Senator... It appears that the Dolans, using their power and large piles of pesos, have all but killed the plan. Would be interested to hear what people think. Here's the story:

The Dolan family, which owns Madison Square Garden, has the drawn the ire of supporters of the plan to move the arena so that Penn Station could be transformed into Moynihan Station. That plan looks all but dead after the Dolans announced yesterday that they will proceed with a renovation of their reviled 1968 arena, which infamously replaced the original Penn Station. City Council President Christine Quinn hinted that the city's approval of the Garden's renovation might not be granted.

The joint venture between the Related Companies and Vornado, which would have partnered with the Garden on building a new arena, says it remains "committed" to the project. Related and Vornado want to fill the area with new office towers, and had offered to $550 million for the new Penn Station, which would have cost almost $3 billion. The city and state only planned to contribute $300 million, with the rest expected to come from the federal government.

http://ny.therealdeal.com/articles/dolans-denounced-for-killing-penn-station-plans

way to ruin our franchise you cocksucker.